Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-15 17:12:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5C492EA76D6F3B7142621FC5FDD272F79D2229A4B568DA7F8B888ADC11902C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed, tweet never said whether their bankruptcy was approved or not. Tweet simply stated that they had filed for bankruptcy, and that it was legal.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658125932857524225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5C492EA76D6F3B7142621FC5FDD272F79D2229A4B568DA7F8B888ADC11902C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1684170778071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658125932857524225A5C492EA76D6F3B7142621FC5FDD272F79D2229A4B568DA7F8B888ADC11902C9