Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 07:36:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 965D6D42A1FDCFDCC81E263DDBCBCA7EA42D4B0453A9F7E799FFFEB4085C4B21
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. At the time he was bound by the doctrine of collective responsibility, so may have argued against voter ID, before being obliged to publicly support it after it was agreed by his former colleagues. Now out of government, he can express personal views on policy. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/collective-responsibility

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658118128113442816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 965D6D42A1FDCFDCC81E263DDBCBCA7EA42D4B0453A9F7E799FFFEB4085C4B21
  • createdAtMillis - 1684222593143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658118128113442816965D6D42A1FDCFDCC81E263DDBCBCA7EA42D4B0453A9F7E799FFFEB4085C4B21