Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 07:36:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7212DA6B2F43BB013E654DC1A4C935A3EB0F8F3CB5099E7EB7956FC43D4B8B77
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. At the time he was bound by the doctrine of collective responsibility, so may have argued against voter ID, before being obliged to publicly support it after it was agreed by his former colleagues. Now out of government, he can express personal views on policy. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/collective-responsibility

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658118128113442816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7212DA6B2F43BB013E654DC1A4C935A3EB0F8F3CB5099E7EB7956FC43D4B8B77
  • createdAtMillis - 1684222593143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16581181281134428167212DA6B2F43BB013E654DC1A4C935A3EB0F8F3CB5099E7EB7956FC43D4B8B77