Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-15 20:59:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45B0A0757A8ED7B6F73609E4EC02560A6BA9E71D9ACC65D66F33C3432AE5CFD3
Participant Details

Original Note:

O editorial do Estadão não desmerece as habilidades de Zanin, mas questiona a escolha de seu nome ao STF apenas por "ser um bom advogado": "Não se sabe o que ele pensa. Suas posições jurídicas são uma incógnita." https://www.estadao.com.br/opiniao/a-construcao-de-um-mau-caminho/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658117659433611266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45B0A0757A8ED7B6F73609E4EC02560A6BA9E71D9ACC65D66F33C3432AE5CFD3
  • createdAtMillis - 1684184383643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165811765943361126645B0A0757A8ED7B6F73609E4EC02560A6BA9E71D9ACC65D66F33C3432AE5CFD3