Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-14 13:09:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73987510F894F1E06E74D8C660D7E6639BB8F103F8DE1BAF21ACED361D26E465
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a link to a study. No factual claims other than obvious personal opinions. Comments belong in the tweet threat not CN. Branch covidians, at least try to appear less biased and more professional here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657734518445359106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73987510F894F1E06E74D8C660D7E6639BB8F103F8DE1BAF21ACED361D26E465
  • createdAtMillis - 1684069768728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165773451844535910673987510F894F1E06E74D8C660D7E6639BB8F103F8DE1BAF21ACED361D26E465