Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-14 07:22:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8CF64214990E411116AB0D5884A82DAC57852D7128BA5632FF6B56E965B8780
Participant Details

Original Note:

Here’s my take, to add to the hundreds of others: Why do we need a “added context not needed“ note type at all? “NOTE NOT NEEDED“ is already an option when rating contextual notes. That should suffice, and would reduce all of the overload.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657634267340623874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8CF64214990E411116AB0D5884A82DAC57852D7128BA5632FF6B56E965B8780
  • createdAtMillis - 1684048935077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1657634267340623874A8CF64214990E411116AB0D5884A82DAC57852D7128BA5632FF6B56E965B8780