Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-14 07:25:25 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A8563C1843990DD011693F0D5167C70DFA077DD62DEBD5FD9F03861D1166C9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Here’s my take, to add to the hundreds of others: Why do we need a “added context not needed“ note type at all? “NOTE NOT NEEDED“ is already an option when rating contextual notes. That should suffice, and would reduce all of the overload.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657634267340623874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A8563C1843990DD011693F0D5167C70DFA077DD62DEBD5FD9F03861D1166C9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1684049125248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16576342673406238745A8563C1843990DD011693F0D5167C70DFA077DD62DEBD5FD9F03861D1166C9F