Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-15 16:16:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52A68300B267FC47E070A151D1E10D063EEF8D210112F523D24B85E06807AB92
Participant Details

Original Note:

Here’s my take, to add to the hundreds of others: Why do we need a “added context not needed“ note type at all? “NOTE NOT NEEDED“ is already an option when rating contextual notes. That should suffice, and would reduce all of the overload.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657634267340623874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52A68300B267FC47E070A151D1E10D063EEF8D210112F523D24B85E06807AB92
  • createdAtMillis - 1684167412956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165763426734062387452A68300B267FC47E070A151D1E10D063EEF8D210112F523D24B85E06807AB92