Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-05 16:06:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E39016F361F95877B4A322CAD636255BD172AD5C6C6041E3736462FF811C4CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Here’s my take, to add to the hundreds of others: Why do we need a “added context not needed“ note type at all? “NOTE NOT NEEDED“ is already an option when rating contextual notes. That should suffice, and would reduce all of the overload.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657634267340623874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E39016F361F95877B4A322CAD636255BD172AD5C6C6041E3736462FF811C4CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1685981162115
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16576342673406238744E39016F361F95877B4A322CAD636255BD172AD5C6C6041E3736462FF811C4CB