Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 01:16:20 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0E4216A3ECF33D4E6118AD291EC8C6553FD95E9C76ABC3EE023D140248363E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's worth noting that while the case did indeed go in Wikipedia's favor, the site was banned in Turkey from 2017 until the 2019 ruling. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-wikipedia/turkeys-block-on-wikipedia-violates-rights-court-rules-idUSKBN1YU0S3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657546305391017985
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0E4216A3ECF33D4E6118AD291EC8C6553FD95E9C76ABC3EE023D140248363E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1684199780968
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1657546305391017985B0E4216A3ECF33D4E6118AD291EC8C6553FD95E9C76ABC3EE023D140248363E4