Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-14 13:14:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48B2B9051B7C54F0574D2CA85C7E47CC7D951CB816E38E06E7C568DC8CD80B9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's worth noting that while the case did indeed go in Wikipedia's favor, the site was banned in Turkey from 2017 until the 2019 ruling. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-wikipedia/turkeys-block-on-wikipedia-violates-rights-court-rules-idUSKBN1YU0S3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657546305391017985
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48B2B9051B7C54F0574D2CA85C7E47CC7D951CB816E38E06E7C568DC8CD80B9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1684070055537
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 165754630539101798548B2B9051B7C54F0574D2CA85C7E47CC7D951CB816E38E06E7C568DC8CD80B9C