Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-14 15:38:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C772D1511594AACECEAB89AF277FD25773C08A6741FB23543772AE9155E2AEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Elon was wise to remain skeptical. The report’s headline fails to state it is not a peer-reviewed study—it is a paper by CCDH (https://counterhate.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CCDH-Deadly-by-Design_120922.pdf), and the report has serious flaws (some test account names included the string “losewieght”) CCDH accused Twitter 2.0 of “monetizing hate” https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/04/17/world/twitter-monetizing-hate/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657485009605754881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C772D1511594AACECEAB89AF277FD25773C08A6741FB23543772AE9155E2AEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1684078691237
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16574850096057548818C772D1511594AACECEAB89AF277FD25773C08A6741FB23543772AE9155E2AEC