Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-14 17:20:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C89665A6C922A223F9B31F403FF3A4268599A90638E4987A6367D631DCE6B4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses an opinion or stance widely held by a significant number of historians, as well as clearly being intended in a humorous manner. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657441483169882113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C89665A6C922A223F9B31F403FF3A4268599A90638E4987A6367D631DCE6B4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1684084805635
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16574414831698821136C89665A6C922A223F9B31F403FF3A4268599A90638E4987A6367D631DCE6B4C