Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 07:20:47 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE79C6F9450E6C097ED90C49C67F848450B8B7E0DA4BCDCE151EEE92F0727803
Participant Details

Original Note:

使われている論文から、この解釈は十分に可能です。 むしろ否定情報にもチェリーピックな解釈があり、このツイートを誤解と判断出来る物ではありません。 この意見は解釈の意味の説明なので、特に引用する素材は添付していません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657338208676642816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE79C6F9450E6C097ED90C49C67F848450B8B7E0DA4BCDCE151EEE92F0727803
  • createdAtMillis - 1690528847535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1657338208676642816CE79C6F9450E6C097ED90C49C67F848450B8B7E0DA4BCDCE151EEE92F0727803