Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-13 10:54:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6AA194686A5D826625F37E7AEE82AF5C0C86AECDE62C63D94D209F5D9201242
Participant Details

Original Note:

使われている論文から、この解釈は十分に可能です。 むしろ否定情報にもチェリーピックな解釈があり、このツイートを誤解と判断出来る物ではありません。 この意見は解釈の意味の説明なので、特に引用する素材は添付していません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657338208676642816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6AA194686A5D826625F37E7AEE82AF5C0C86AECDE62C63D94D209F5D9201242
  • createdAtMillis - 1683975263163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1657338208676642816C6AA194686A5D826625F37E7AEE82AF5C0C86AECDE62C63D94D209F5D9201242