Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 08:11:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3085F7776510C9D1D0086FAA703029AD0695AE4987664F9F93E85A2AE5505FF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

使われている論文から、この解釈は十分に可能です。 むしろ否定情報にもチェリーピックな解釈があり、このツイートを誤解と判断出来る物ではありません。 この意見は解釈の意味の説明なので、特に引用する素材は添付していません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657338208676642816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3085F7776510C9D1D0086FAA703029AD0695AE4987664F9F93E85A2AE5505FF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1684743066226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16573382086766428163085F7776510C9D1D0086FAA703029AD0695AE4987664F9F93E85A2AE5505FF1