Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 22:59:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C8D2CDA8F10B7B1C41F8A2C751F18E6DC89B9F75323FF1E6BF2591086D56256
Participant Details

Original Note:

Private eye's reporting was correct, and journalist Richard Brooks provides his evidence in the replies to this tweet This statement deliberately conflates the facts regarding the amount paid for the land with the author's beliefs about the overall benefits it might provide https://twitter.com/rbrooks45/status/1656306240685842432

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656827857232973826
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C8D2CDA8F10B7B1C41F8A2C751F18E6DC89B9F75323FF1E6BF2591086D56256
  • createdAtMillis - 1705877972676
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16568278572329738267C8D2CDA8F10B7B1C41F8A2C751F18E6DC89B9F75323FF1E6BF2591086D56256