Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-15 05:47:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0AB2A28517D425A43181AC64F3FB6EA399F5B4076AF1674B6B993034CA052F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This appears to be a highly misleading claim. Researchers performed a systematic search of the books that @PENamerica claimed were “banned” & found that in an overwhelming number of cases, books that were claimed to be “banned” remained available and in active circulation. https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/05/11/fact-checking-dispels-the-book-banning-fiction/ https://twitter.com/jaypgreene/status/1656664546986311681?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656822394026094593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0AB2A28517D425A43181AC64F3FB6EA399F5B4076AF1674B6B993034CA052F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1684129672352
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656822394026094593A0AB2A28517D425A43181AC64F3FB6EA399F5B4076AF1674B6B993034CA052F3