Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-12 01:32:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D41130B60D66BCC6FAA1115676546405A37F3BC90991FC00CA533B7A32609D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This appears to be a highly misleading claim. Researchers performed a systematic search of the books that @PENamerica claimed were “banned” & found that in an overwhelming number of cases, books that were claimed to be “banned” remained available and in active circulation. https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/05/11/fact-checking-dispels-the-book-banning-fiction/ https://twitter.com/jaypgreene/status/1656664546986311681?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656822394026094593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D41130B60D66BCC6FAA1115676546405A37F3BC90991FC00CA533B7A32609D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1683855154893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16568223940260945939D41130B60D66BCC6FAA1115676546405A37F3BC90991FC00CA533B7A32609D7