Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 20:06:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9273FB978B169F4C5DA9F045CAD35479254A11AA0A806F86CE60F88E43B433BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note offered says there was no evidence of African origin, but the picture in the tweet does not show someone who appears to be of African origin

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656769322822385668
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9273FB978B169F4C5DA9F045CAD35479254A11AA0A806F86CE60F88E43B433BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1684440406818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16567693228223856689273FB978B169F4C5DA9F045CAD35479254A11AA0A806F86CE60F88E43B433BA