Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-12 01:30:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A08816DD036BC43B1A8D197FA721FDB3007665B9C3B7D9EC6C7475540A167BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This uses the ‘No true Scotsman’ logical fallacy, defined as “an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.” https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656689047035846656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A08816DD036BC43B1A8D197FA721FDB3007665B9C3B7D9EC6C7475540A167BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1683855056012
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16566890470358466560A08816DD036BC43B1A8D197FA721FDB3007665B9C3B7D9EC6C7475540A167BA