Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-11 17:00:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD73E8B6315391ED539B83865BD89D76AA782D68AB586CB1B470C3EC42D041F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Está nota do STF, embora aparente uma simples informação a respeito dos atos de ofício de um “único” juiz, Analisando de uma forma mais detalhada, Se trata de terrorismo. Estão produzindo atos de coerção a liberdade e visam aterrorizar a população brasileira. Tudo tem um limite

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656660006937444357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD73E8B6315391ED539B83865BD89D76AA782D68AB586CB1B470C3EC42D041F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1683824409182
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656660006937444357BD73E8B6315391ED539B83865BD89D76AA782D68AB586CB1B470C3EC42D041F9