Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-11 15:28:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83142D95A9EB2547942E2F4D5C55AD0836C9119FEB842CA5E3F981D7C336988D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Está nota do STF, embora aparente uma simples informação a respeito dos atos de ofício de um “único” juiz, Analisando de uma forma mais detalhada, Se trata de terrorismo. Estão produzindo atos de coerção a liberdade e visam aterrorizar a população brasileira. Tudo tem um limite

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656660006937444357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83142D95A9EB2547942E2F4D5C55AD0836C9119FEB842CA5E3F981D7C336988D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683818916450
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165666000693744435783142D95A9EB2547942E2F4D5C55AD0836C9119FEB842CA5E3F981D7C336988D