Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-12 00:47:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39834CE32BE2ED97A7DFD0A4E40ACE8EB53C09A5A619DC90B4FEA4998DBD88D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper was published in 2022 in Health Physics, and attracted several comments calling out major flaws. https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Citation/2022/07000/Comment_on__World_Atmospheric_CO2,_Its_14C.3.aspx https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Citation/2022/06000/Comment_on__World_Atmospheric_CO2,_Its_14C.13.aspx https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Citation/2022/06000/Comments_on__World_Atmospheric_CO2,_Its_14C.11.aspx Primarily the criticism revolves around incorrect accounting for various carbon sinks such as the ocean, and lack of review by atmospheric scientists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656642312456290304
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39834CE32BE2ED97A7DFD0A4E40ACE8EB53C09A5A619DC90B4FEA4998DBD88D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1683852425352
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165664231245629030439834CE32BE2ED97A7DFD0A4E40ACE8EB53C09A5A619DC90B4FEA4998DBD88D9