Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-11 04:35:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3548C7FFD56DD6413977A63F2119C3E183FB3F3234159044AFE3E31C42ADA828
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet makes no claims about what staff do; proposed note is unnecessary under CN guidelines. Moreover, resignation of one's staff is a very public and recognizable sign that something is wrong or amiss, while proposed note seems to imply it wouldn't change anything. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656455869045919744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3548C7FFD56DD6413977A63F2119C3E183FB3F3234159044AFE3E31C42ADA828
  • createdAtMillis - 1683779732437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16564558690459197443548C7FFD56DD6413977A63F2119C3E183FB3F3234159044AFE3E31C42ADA828