Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 23:05:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AF4A56557AABB943A512BC7AB398A95A0F196F2F23CFFC2E6321B465425C14A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources included in the proposed note directly contradict the note writer’s claims. Both cite bellingcat as an example of extremely good open-source reporting, and even how they were *able to counter a psyops operation using OSINT.* Simply put, the proposed note is wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656429088977072129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AF4A56557AABB943A512BC7AB398A95A0F196F2F23CFFC2E6321B465425C14A
  • createdAtMillis - 1683759919344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16564290889770721296AF4A56557AABB943A512BC7AB398A95A0F196F2F23CFFC2E6321B465425C14A