Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 17:47:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 066CEF6E72CC30543D4AED16C948E00783551E84D87E1C6AC133A11B2C7C306E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources included in the proposed note directly contradict the note writer’s claims. Both cite bellingcat as an example of extremely good open-source reporting, and even how they were *able to counter a psyops operation using OSINT.* Simply put, the proposed note is wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656429088977072129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 066CEF6E72CC30543D4AED16C948E00783551E84D87E1C6AC133A11B2C7C306E
  • createdAtMillis - 1690825668230
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656429088977072129066CEF6E72CC30543D4AED16C948E00783551E84D87E1C6AC133A11B2C7C306E