Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 04:45:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96E2BCF9745FF38FA7975D3D702BAAA75CB4D70819B50DA85F536B5E60DEFF8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

After reading the FEC findings, which was very informative, I still think there are unanswered questions that are worth delving into that the article alides too. There are still questions about the distribution of funding and more generally, the impact of how funds were used.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656182310499414018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96E2BCF9745FF38FA7975D3D702BAAA75CB4D70819B50DA85F536B5E60DEFF8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1684298735685
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165618231049941401896E2BCF9745FF38FA7975D3D702BAAA75CB4D70819B50DA85F536B5E60DEFF8C