Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 19:20:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4E56924FE3B26103E22B1BE843D5C3509937526A6FD6644A4BD33BD481E567E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esta publicación presenta cero objetividad en su mensaje, siendo que al ser una cuenta pública busca promover el desacuerdo de sus seguidores contra un la SCJN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656177546986405888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4E56924FE3B26103E22B1BE843D5C3509937526A6FD6644A4BD33BD481E567E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683746430246
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656177546986405888C4E56924FE3B26103E22B1BE843D5C3509937526A6FD6644A4BD33BD481E567E