Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 12:54:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDE666E9F666E543A0B18883DC5B42F9B5E9254D8AB8BDE6DC1A7A894C06F2FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet sarcastically exhibits the writer's opinion. No Note Needed. And a note for the person writing the unnecessary and opinionated Note... your own source states "Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped". That means they didn't believe her.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656128587517550594
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDE666E9F666E543A0B18883DC5B42F9B5E9254D8AB8BDE6DC1A7A894C06F2FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1683723261779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656128587517550594DDE666E9F666E543A0B18883DC5B42F9B5E9254D8AB8BDE6DC1A7A894C06F2FD