Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 02:58:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 687849BED745CF348C71989C9E80E750C1B7124B0E582ACD16F425AEA85D43D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet sarcastically exhibits the writer's opinion. No Note Needed. And a note for the person writing the unnecessary and opinionated Note... your own source states "Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped". That means they didn't believe her.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656128587517550594
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 687849BED745CF348C71989C9E80E750C1B7124B0E582ACD16F425AEA85D43D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1683687525167
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656128587517550594687849BED745CF348C71989C9E80E750C1B7124B0E582ACD16F425AEA85D43D7