Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 03:57:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet sarcastically exhibits the writer's opinion. No Note Needed. And a note for the person writing the unnecessary and opinionated Note... your own source states "Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped". That means they didn't believe her.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656128587517550594
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
  • createdAtMillis - 1683691078239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656128587517550594648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130