Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 03:21:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3BD772CBD54663D9DAEDB6E1B047EEC6439A848D5637AD7A0FA6DA70358E19D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet sarcastically exhibits the writer's opinion. No Note Needed. And a note for the person writing the unnecessary and opinionated Note... your own source states "Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped". That means they didn't believe her.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656128587517550594
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3BD772CBD54663D9DAEDB6E1B047EEC6439A848D5637AD7A0FA6DA70358E19D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683688872400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16561285875175505943BD772CBD54663D9DAEDB6E1B047EEC6439A848D5637AD7A0FA6DA70358E19D0