Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 10:23:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F49D3FBD7FBB9C0EB40972E4A259BA1319723EDECF9494359BB25E44F0F6786
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a civil suit, not a criminal one. The plaintiff must prove their case by a mere preponderance of the evidence—not beyond reasonable doubt, as one would in a criminal case (1). As such, there are no “guilty” or “not guilty” verdicts (2). 1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/burden_of_proof 2. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/verdict/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656095334718926848
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F49D3FBD7FBB9C0EB40972E4A259BA1319723EDECF9494359BB25E44F0F6786
  • createdAtMillis - 1683714184989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16560953347189268482F49D3FBD7FBB9C0EB40972E4A259BA1319723EDECF9494359BB25E44F0F6786