Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 00:39:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDA628255D31897C8F973658B1B54CE84F44FF5A4CDD44B2997DC102CAC1A2E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is impossible to precisely determine the amount or percentage of biased journalism or intentionally misleading communications in mainstream news. T.C. is addressing a legitimate concern, however, and has the right to do so. "Rethinking Journalism Standards" https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01634437211040669

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656087330292113411
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDA628255D31897C8F973658B1B54CE84F44FF5A4CDD44B2997DC102CAC1A2E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1683679184040
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1656087330292113411DDA628255D31897C8F973658B1B54CE84F44FF5A4CDD44B2997DC102CAC1A2E8