Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 19:26:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEAB8F0EAFCEA20BD2E4DCFD8A69BB22D7F22680700ED0D78DBC4D0C6CD42F91
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note makes the same error this tweet criticizes, failing to take population sizes into account. Disagreements about the method should be offered in replies, no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655988423088324610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEAB8F0EAFCEA20BD2E4DCFD8A69BB22D7F22680700ED0D78DBC4D0C6CD42F91
  • createdAtMillis - 1683660380124
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655988423088324610CEAB8F0EAFCEA20BD2E4DCFD8A69BB22D7F22680700ED0D78DBC4D0C6CD42F91