Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 17:17:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7815B3EF7D46E4D0688EAF8C27C221CF3D37D7F72C59B9DEC5BF6BC85B6C6E8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note makes the same error this tweet criticizes, failing to take population sizes into account. Disagreements about the method should be offered in replies, no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655988423088324610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7815B3EF7D46E4D0688EAF8C27C221CF3D37D7F72C59B9DEC5BF6BC85B6C6E8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683739022269
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16559884230883246107815B3EF7D46E4D0688EAF8C27C221CF3D37D7F72C59B9DEC5BF6BC85B6C6E8E