Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 02:24:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3931E4E86CD580E253AAADFDD68C207E4EE89E2CDD42A06D6A6AD856CC37BED0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note makes the same error this tweet criticizes, failing to take population sizes into account. Disagreements about the method should be offered in replies, no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655988423088324610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3931E4E86CD580E253AAADFDD68C207E4EE89E2CDD42A06D6A6AD856CC37BED0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683685481626
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16559884230883246103931E4E86CD580E253AAADFDD68C207E4EE89E2CDD42A06D6A6AD856CC37BED0