Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 21:30:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1569385FE2849C8E5F68FF4497F5A60D631C99B2CD445808ECBEB18F21C1763D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note makes the same error this tweet criticizes, failing to take population sizes into account. Disagreements about the method should be offered in replies, no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655988423088324610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1569385FE2849C8E5F68FF4497F5A60D631C99B2CD445808ECBEB18F21C1763D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683667814301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16559884230883246101569385FE2849C8E5F68FF4497F5A60D631C99B2CD445808ECBEB18F21C1763D