Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 16:31:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0ABF1E0B62F9B518D5E0A7A25C91827DB9715ED61E98110F6AD503F98C3673A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note makes the same error this tweet criticizes, failing to take population sizes into account. Disagreements about the method should be offered in replies, no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655988423088324610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0ABF1E0B62F9B518D5E0A7A25C91827DB9715ED61E98110F6AD503F98C3673A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1683736265388
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16559884230883246100ABF1E0B62F9B518D5E0A7A25C91827DB9715ED61E98110F6AD503F98C3673A2