Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 19:12:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED10AF9D87EC3C464CE4E82C9BE9AAD2FCC95475D6924F4411832E098790BEF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is not necessary to nitpick the use of the word “constitutional”. Furthermore, in deciding on Roe v. Wade (the decision that was overturned), the Supreme Court used interpretation of constitutional rights to make their decision. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655950301139193857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED10AF9D87EC3C464CE4E82C9BE9AAD2FCC95475D6924F4411832E098790BEF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1683659550785
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655950301139193857ED10AF9D87EC3C464CE4E82C9BE9AAD2FCC95475D6924F4411832E098790BEF8