Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 19:18:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8B7DEE54D9DB27DBBA10B53B035C4B7BE1E605DBA403FE18026C5747F32693B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is not necessary to nitpick the use of the word “constitutional”. Furthermore, in deciding on Roe v. Wade (the decision that was overturned), the Supreme Court used interpretation of constitutional rights to make their decision. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655950301139193857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8B7DEE54D9DB27DBBA10B53B035C4B7BE1E605DBA403FE18026C5747F32693B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683659905103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655950301139193857D8B7DEE54D9DB27DBBA10B53B035C4B7BE1E605DBA403FE18026C5747F32693B