Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 15:21:52 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5FB09DB2D4859CD7DF1509989EA9AD7F897555116E570B26501E5EF643DB6E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is not necessary to nitpick the use of the word “constitutional”. Furthermore, in deciding on Roe v. Wade (the decision that was overturned), the Supreme Court used interpretation of constitutional rights to make their decision. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655950301139193857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5FB09DB2D4859CD7DF1509989EA9AD7F897555116E570B26501E5EF643DB6E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1683645712049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655950301139193857D5FB09DB2D4859CD7DF1509989EA9AD7F897555116E570B26501E5EF643DB6E1