Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 15:46:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC2422CFF22362FEA7478F7A8626B301CD90F6D06DC14F6E0FE8C0FCB0BBB8EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is not necessary to nitpick the use of the word “constitutional”. Furthermore, in deciding on Roe v. Wade (the decision that was overturned), the Supreme Court used interpretation of constitutional rights to make their decision. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655950301139193857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC2422CFF22362FEA7478F7A8626B301CD90F6D06DC14F6E0FE8C0FCB0BBB8EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1683647181091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655950301139193857AC2422CFF22362FEA7478F7A8626B301CD90F6D06DC14F6E0FE8C0FCB0BBB8EB