Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 15:36:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04243FCEE3704BBA1846E5009F2BA03EE36A98C381FDA424FCB38AB8C1B242BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is not necessary to nitpick the use of the word “constitutional”. Furthermore, in deciding on Roe v. Wade (the decision that was overturned), the Supreme Court used interpretation of constitutional rights to make their decision. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655950301139193857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04243FCEE3704BBA1846E5009F2BA03EE36A98C381FDA424FCB38AB8C1B242BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1683646561876
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165595030113919385704243FCEE3704BBA1846E5009F2BA03EE36A98C381FDA424FCB38AB8C1B242BE