Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 16:31:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E3AD2E75901B34BB3A02CC0E52F320C95E209B45038F7C7CCA1CB9E26597047
Participant Details

Original Note:

Several sites have reported this to Br untrue . It is not possible to find the article even when using the wayback machine . https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-tom-hanks-hoax-idUSL1N2PG20A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655923125261942790
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E3AD2E75901B34BB3A02CC0E52F320C95E209B45038F7C7CCA1CB9E26597047
  • createdAtMillis - 1683649913526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16559231252619427909E3AD2E75901B34BB3A02CC0E52F320C95E209B45038F7C7CCA1CB9E26597047