Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 13:50:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6B69FE8604F90BEF04233AFF97E211A661A73DBA3460B185721AE2ACFFE5C0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Any tweet reporting unconfirmed pictures as fact should be pointed out as unverified. That is all a note should say. Quoting MSM sources or NGOs as fact checkers is non sense. We do not know. No one should be reporting any social media as fact. Learn from the past.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1655894979766624256
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E6B69FE8604F90BEF04233AFF97E211A661A73DBA3460B185721AE2ACFFE5C0C
createdAtMillis - 1683640201106
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1655894979766624256E6B69FE8604F90BEF04233AFF97E211A661A73DBA3460B185721AE2ACFFE5C0C