Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 14:28:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 136ED5E9C331B628122AF8B5938CED346CEC1BE52A8C9E65449E4AEC700EE651
Participant Details

Original Note:

Any tweet reporting unconfirmed pictures as fact should be pointed out as unverified. That is all a note should say. Quoting MSM sources or NGOs as fact checkers is non sense. We do not know. No one should be reporting any social media as fact. Learn from the past.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1655894979766624256
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 136ED5E9C331B628122AF8B5938CED346CEC1BE52A8C9E65449E4AEC700EE651
createdAtMillis - 1683642486874
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1655894979766624256136ED5E9C331B628122AF8B5938CED346CEC1BE52A8C9E65449E4AEC700EE651