Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 22:38:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5549ED322650EE50123197930B0AA7B0DC1CCFF041E0C91F7FC9A43AC59411E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The suggested note above provides an opinion on government spending, but there was no inaccuracy in the tweet that needed to be corrected. Debate about allocating funds can be had in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655881842753413121
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5549ED322650EE50123197930B0AA7B0DC1CCFF041E0C91F7FC9A43AC59411E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683671936466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655881842753413121A5549ED322650EE50123197930B0AA7B0DC1CCFF041E0C91F7FC9A43AC59411E