Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 19:43:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F31D4A409E6B258DD92C0A5C90B81C3571D9C7F1DF4DE8E6070259C8C409C5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The suggested note above provides an opinion on government spending, but there was no inaccuracy in the tweet that needed to be corrected. Debate about allocating funds can be had in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655881842753413121
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F31D4A409E6B258DD92C0A5C90B81C3571D9C7F1DF4DE8E6070259C8C409C5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683661413135
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16558818427534131217F31D4A409E6B258DD92C0A5C90B81C3571D9C7F1DF4DE8E6070259C8C409C5E